Peer Review Assignments
3
Pending Reviews
8
Completed Reviews
5
Reviews Received
4.2
Avg Rating Given
Medical Peer Review Guidelines
Follow these guidelines for effective peer review in medical education
- Maintain professional and constructive feedback in all medical case reviews
- Focus on clinical reasoning, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment protocols
- Respect patient confidentiality and medical ethics in case discussions
- Provide specific examples and suggestions for improvement
- Be objective and evidence-based in your medical assessments
- Complete reviews within 72 hours to maintain learning momentum
- Use appropriate medical terminology and maintain academic standards
Pathology Case Study - Cardiovascular System
Pathology
Dr. Rajesh Kumar
Assigned: Jul 14, 2025
Pending Review
Due: Jul 17, 2025
Weight: 10%
2 Peers to Review
2 days remaining
5 Criteria
Assigned Peer Submissions
RG
Rahul Gupta
MBBS 2nd Year • Student ID: MBBS2025045
Myocardial_Infarction_Analysis.pdf
Submitted: Jul 14, 2025 • 2.1 MB
Submitted: Jul 14, 2025 • 2.1 MB
SP
Sneha Patel
MBBS 2nd Year • Student ID: MBBS2025032
Cardiac_Pathology_Case_Study.docx
Submitted: Jul 13, 2025 • 1.8 MB
Submitted: Jul 13, 2025 • 1.8 MB
Pharmacology Drug Analysis - CNS Medications
Pharmacology
Dr. Priya Sharma
Assigned: Jul 12, 2025
In Progress
Due: Jul 16, 2025
Weight: 8%
3 Peers to Review
1 day remaining
1 of 3 completed
Microbiology Lab Report - Bacterial Identification
Microbiology
Dr. Anita Singh
Completed: Jul 10, 2025
Completed
Avg Rating Given: 4.5/5
3 Peers Reviewed
Average Score: 85%
15 Comments Given
Quality Score: 95%
Your Pathology Case Study Review
Pathology
3 Peer Reviews
Received: Jul 11, 2025
Reviews Complete
Overall Score: 88/100
Average Rating: 4.4/5
12 Comments Received
Strengths: 8 points
Improvements: 4 points
Peer Feedback Summary
Strengths Highlighted:
- Excellent clinical correlation with pathophysiology
- Clear and well-structured case analysis
- Good use of medical terminology and evidence
Areas for Improvement:
- Include more recent diagnostic markers
- Expand on differential diagnosis considerations